The Kenya–Somalia–Ethiopia tri-border region is shaped by fluid and cyclical conflict dynamics, influenced by climate stress, livelihood pressure, shifting alliances, resource competition and wider political developments. In this context, violence is rarely static. Individuals and groups may move between roles as pastoralists, traders, mediators or combatants depending on seasonal, economic and security conditions.
The peace and security landscape is further complicated by informal power brokers, youth groups, militias and formal security actors whose allegiances can shift in response to incentives, political influence or survival needs. Uneven governance across the three borders also limits coordinated prevention and response. While Kenya and Ethiopia have stronger formal systems, Somalia’s fragmented governance context relies heavily on traditional mechanisms such as Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Weak cross-border coordination, limited enforcement of agreements and gaps in justice systems mean peace initiatives can remain fragile. Despite formal border closures, informal cross-border interactions continue through local arrangements, making border governance a critical area for investment.
BORESHA-NABAD responds by strengthening linkages between communities, civil society actors, local authorities, national institutions and regional actors. The programme facilitates continuous context analysis, reinforces community and government-led response mechanisms, supports justice referral linkages, and integrates livelihood resilience to reduce economic stress and social tensions.
INTERVENTION AREAS
· Conflict monitoring and analysis, enabling communities, authorities, and partners to track evolving conflict, security, and border governance dynamics and respond proactively to emerging risks.
· Building inclusive peace and governance mechanisms, by reinforcing community-led and government-led structures responsible for conflict prevention, dialogue, mediation, and coordinated response.
· Improving justice and accountability linkages, by connecting peacebuilding and violence extremism efforts with formal and informal referral pathways for cross-border disputes and conflict-related incidents.
· Expanding inclusive participation in peace systems, supporting women, youth, elders, religious leaders, and community representatives to play active roles in dialogue, mediation, advocacy, and decision-making processes.
· Addressing the economic drivers of conflict, by integrating livelihood, resilience, and economic inclusion interventions that reduce resource competition, strengthen social cohesion, and create shared opportunities.
· Strengthening border governance and cross-border coordination, enabling institutions and stakeholders to collaboratively manage shared resources, mobility, and emerging friction points before they escalate into wider instability.
RESULTS SNAPSHOT
· Local peace and mediation systems strengthened, with 525 individuals engaged in structured conflict prevention dialogue platforms
· Cross-border peace architecture reinforced, with 245 participants engaged in joint peace and cultural cohesion initiatives
· Conflict resolution and negotiation capacities enhanced, with 170 actors trained in peace agreement processes and 130 supported in mediation pathways
· Community-led governance systems strengthened, with 15 sub-county action plans developed to support locally owned peace and stability processes
· Social cohesion systems reinforced, with 1,155 stakeholders participating in advocacy, dialogue, and peacebuilding processes
· Women and youth inclusion in peace systems expanded, with 525 actively engaged in peacebuilding roles